Wow 2000 calories? Since starting fast5 I am lucky to get to 1000 cal and not even 500 on my training days
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
The wording of the article was almost comically inflammatory, such that I assumed that convincing anyone wasn't actually his intent, but rather he wanted to start an argument so he could get traffic to his website. :P "Trolling" as a business plan, if you will.
Either that, or he really is a loon who doesn't know how to make a reasonable-sounding argument.
(And anyone who is eating meals the size he describes isn't doing IF properly because...dang...my appetite gets so small on IF that I can barely eat 2000 calories, nevermind 6000+)
--- In fast5@yahoogroups.com, "andy030144" <andy030144@...> wrote:
>
> That article doesn't say anything bad about IF, it puts down gorging on junk. People did not eat frequent meals years ago. It was feast/famine all the way. Then it compares sports performance when fasting or eating... who cares? He totally misunderstood everything and who cares what he says if he can't even be bothered to compare apples to apples. IF must be a really good idea if the best the detractors can come up with is THIS. :) Besides, this is the same s**t they said about Animalbolics ten years ago so he's way behind the times anyway. Fad diets only last a year or two at best and IF (if you start with Animalbolics) is now on its 12th year and its going strong.
>
> --- In fast5@yahoogroups.com, Dan Lurie <dl1021@> wrote:
> >
> > Apparently Colpo is not a fan of IF.
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > > From: theomnivorenewsletter <ac.theomnivore@>
> > > Date: September 22, 2010 9:04:02 PM EDT
> > > To: the_omnivore@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [the_omnivore] Why Intermittent Fasting Isn't All It's Cracked
>
No comments:
Post a Comment