Actually, Barnaby, when I started reading that YOU were down to an hour or so a day, I began to go in that direction. For the last week or so (except the last 2 days), I ate for about 2 hours, not a 5-hour window. Results are that I feel lighter, my energy is higher, I think I eat better, and I have absolutely no cravings outside that window.
The last two days have been tense, so I've been eating up to my window. Result is a weight gain, a general sense of flabbiness and I'm not happy with myself.
Back to the two-hour window!
--- In fast5@yahoogroups.com, "barnabywalker" <barnabywalker@...> wrote:
>
>
> Is it safe to assume that nobody is experimenting with different length of time eating meals...Frozen at the book default 5 hours of eating?
>
> Despite referring to "dinner-cqncelling" and "eating in daylight" programs and comparing it to late-night eating, is everybody still stuck at Book Default eating time of day?
>
> Is everybody eating what ever they like as long as they strictly follow the Book on eating time of day and eat a full 5 hour window, so they follow the namesake "Fast-5"?
>
> C'mon, get Brave, and start to report your self-experiment results.
>
> Barnaby
>
No comments:
Post a Comment