Re: [Prince-4ever] No Shock. Debbie Rowe Says Michael Jackson’s Kids Aren’t His. [Dr. FB

Monday, June 29, 2009

Re: [Prince-4ever] No Shock. Debbie Rowe Says Michael Jackson’s Kids Aren’t His. [Dr. FB

None of us really know what the agreement was/is or even if she has had any part in their life besides giving birth to them. I have a child and there is no amount of money in the world that would make me give up all rights to him. If I felt he was better off with someone else for whatever reason I might make that very hard and personal decision but I would demand to have some part of the childs life. We don't know that she sold those children to Michael. The whole situation is so sad, I just hope the kids come out of this okay. I am not sure that MJ's parents are the best people to raise those children, their grown children are not the finest example of parenting......

-----Original Message-----
From: Cassandra <cassandracragg02@aol.com>
To: Prince-4ever@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, Jun 29, 2009 1:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Prince-4ever] No Shock. Debbie Rowe Says Michael Jackson's Kids Aren't His. [Dr. FB

I think ...if she had an agreement with him while he was alive why not honor it and him and the kids by not saying a word. The other things is I am not looking at a woman who sold her kids as someone who is credible about anything.

Ink runs from the corners of my mouth.
There is no happiness like mine. I
have been eating poetry. - Mark Strand

-----Original Message-----
From: ~*[[PFL]]*~ <qaidsharif@yahoo.com>
To: The PMM Yahoo! Group <purplemusicmansion@yahoogroups.com>; The FloridaNPG Yahoo! Group <TheFloridaNPG@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Jun 29, 2009 12:52 pm
Subject: [Prince-4ever] No Shock. Debbie Rowe Says Michael Jackson's Kids Aren't His. [Dr. FB]

No Shock. Debbie Rowe Says Michael Jackson's Kids Aren't His.

Debbie Rowe & Michael Jackson Circa 1996. Photo: Dailymail.co.uk

Debbie Rowe spoke over the weekend that Michael Jackson's kids are not his. She says it was a different sperm donor.

No crap. I think we all know that those kids were not biologically his. It does not change the fact that he was their father for the past 12 years, biological or not.

I don't know why he felt the need to tell us they were his, but that is on him. She says this while announcing she has no plans of taking the kids away from the Jackson family.

Listen, I am not trying to defend him here. I just don't care and have a feeling most of you don't care either. He raised them. Who are we to play flippin' Maurey Povich over here?

How do you guys feel about this being discussed by Debbie Rowe?-Dr.FB

http://www.drfunkenberry.com/2009/06/29/no-shock-debbie-rowe-says-michael-jacksons-kids-arent-his/