I think ...if she had an agreement with him while he was alive why not honor it and him and the kids by not saying a word. The other things is I am not looking at a woman who sold her kids as someone who is credible about anything.
Ink runs from the corners of my mouth.
There is no happiness like mine. I
have been eating poetry. - Mark Strand
-----Original Message-----
From: ~*[[PFL]]*~ <qaidsharif@yahoo.com>
To: The PMM Yahoo! Group <purplemusicmansion@yahoogroups.com>; The FloridaNPG Yahoo! Group <TheFloridaNPG@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Jun 29, 2009 12:52 pm
Subject: [Prince-4ever] No Shock. Debbie Rowe Says Michael Jackson's Kids Aren't His. [Dr. FB]
Debbie Rowe & Michael Jackson Circa 1996. Photo: Dailymail.co.uk
Debbie Rowe spoke over the weekend that Michael Jackson's kids are not his. She says it was a different sperm donor.
No crap. I think we all know that those kids were not biologically his. It does not change the fact that he was their father for the past 12 years, biological or not.
I don't know why he felt the need to tell us they were his, but that is on him. She says this while announcing she has no plans of taking the kids away from the Jackson family.
Listen, I am not trying to defend him here. I just don't care and have a feeling most of you don't care either. He raised them. Who are we to play flippin' Maurey Povich over here?
How do you guys feel about this being discussed by Debbie Rowe?-Dr.FB
http://www.drfunkenberry.com/2009/06/29/no-shock-debbie-rowe-says-michael-jacksons-kids-arent-his/
Peace, Love & Light [& Stay Funky] ...
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheFloridaNPG/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/PurpleMusicMansion/
NPG Member 4 Life ... [Live 4 Love]
No comments:
Post a Comment