The article can be found at:
http://www.fftimes.
I do think it contains useful info for an argument against using the lights all the time.
Sara
--- On Sun, 3/29/09, Sara Schulman <sajesr@yahoo.
From: Sara Schulman <sajesr@yahoo.
Subject: Re: [epilepsy] Re: I HATE the school Bus!
To: epilepsy@yahoogroup
Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 9:05 AM
Last week I tried to send an article about the lights, but I don't think it worked...but the main idea was that the lights were put on becuase they are easy to spot. An added
benefit was that the lights could be seen easily at a distance, so vehicles that are heavy and therefore need extra time to stop could be forwarned. But more important was the idea that the lights were there for emergency situations, and did not need to be on at all times. I'll see if I can post the link here for anyone who would be interested.. .
S
--- On Sat, 3/28/09, barefoothorse2002 <DreamPinto@
From: barefoothorse2002 <DreamPinto@
Subject: [epilepsy] Re: I HATE the school Bus!
To: epilepsy@yahoogroup s.com
Date: Saturday, March 28, 2009, 10:52 PM
((hugs))
If you can't get any action for the strobe light by taking the "epilepsy" tack, try another tack--the light can be confusing, children might not be able to distinguish it from law enforcement in emergencies, it might be distracting during panic situations, i.e--it might do more harm than good.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
No comments:
Post a Comment