I would certainly endorse what Phil says about calories-in, calories-out. Despite observations others have made about "good" or "bad" food categories - and I won't dispute that these concerns may be relevant to other health issues - when it comes to weight loss energy balance is by far the most important factor. If weight is not going down over a reasonable period, then either less food must go in, more energy must be expended, or both. All the properly controlled research studies (crucially, those not dependent on self-reporting) have confirmed an almost straight-line relationship between energy balance and weight. Of course, this shouldn't really surprise anybody, as the converse would violate basic laws of physics (like perpetual motion!). So as Phil says, "whatever you want" doesn't translate to "as much as you want". To put it another way, if you are both wise and fortunate, you can have anything you want, but not everything you want.
My husband has been doing fast 5 for about a year now, primarily to lose weight (he is in good health otherwise). Weight loss has stopped completely. He lost 30 pounds over the first 6 months, then nothing. Now he has actually gained back 5 pounds. he needs to lose another 50 pounds.
He has eaten outside his window maybe 3 to 5 times the entire year, that's it. His window is early in the day, he has tried to change it but been unsuccessful due to business lunches etc, and whereas it used to be easy, he now finds himself hungry in the evenings, although he doesn't give in and eat. He doesn't eat particularly healthy, but one of the things that attracted him to this lifestyle was that he could eat whatever he wants. He gets very little exercise also, but I can guarantee you that would be the most diffcult thing for him to change.
He is so frustrated with hunger and lack of weight loss, I told him I would ask you guys for any ideas.
Thanks,
Beth
No comments:
Post a Comment