The word "metabolism" is correctly used to describe your lean body
mass's calorie and nutrient needs and it's incorrectly used to scare
people into eating when they're not even hungry.
Your metabolism and your lean body mass are the same thing. If you lose
lean body mass, your metabolism goes down because your calorie needs go
down. If you reduce calories to achieve this you run the risk of losing
muscle. F5 does not have you reducing calories, it just has you
increasing the amount of time your body is in a Fasting state and
decreasing the time your body is in the fed state. That's how it works,
not by reducing calories.
Most people overeat because they just eat way too many times during the
day in addition to never feeling a sense of fullness or satisfaction
from their food.
F5 handles both of these problems and is far easier than following any
other diet. If you count the number of hours you are "hungry" when
following a typical diet you will find that you're hungry for a few
hours here and there in addition to those times right after you eat
when you still feel hungry because you ate what you didn't want in
amounts that didn't make you feel satisfied. I remember diets (that did
work) where I would feel hungry all day because the diet food was
tastless and boring and I would feel a low-dull sense of disatisfaction
practically all day long. Even though the diet "worked" and I lost
weight, I just could not stay on them and the weight would come back
because they only worked for as long as you forced yourself to
constantly suffer all day every day. Bodybuilding diets are like that.
They work like a charm but you are constantly drooling and thinking
about food all day long.
On F5 you will endure a few hours at most of a mild yet natrual hunger
while your body fasts but since you know that every day you will be
able to eat to your hearts content this is very tolerable and very well
worth it. I eat at about 6pm every day and I start getting hungry at
about 2pm. This hunger lasts a few hours and it's similar to the hunger
I feel when I eat a small meal and want to eat more. As long as i'm
doing something, I can ignore it. So if I do the math, with every other
diet, I feel hungry all day and if I do F5 I feel a similar hunger for
2-4 hours before I eat. I think it's a good trade off. Plus the health
benefits of fasting are undeniable. On top of the convenience of only
having to prepare 1-2 meals and the time and money savings are another
plus.
If you want to be skeptical of something, be skeptical of the idea that
multiple meals increases your metabolism, because it's a flat out lie.
No one has any proof that eating more times is better than once or
twice. All they have is their word, their opinion. If you do the
opposite of what they say, the sky doesn't fall. The opposite of eating
frequently is to fast and fasting is superior to constant feeding. It
just doesn't line anyone's pockets so you're not going to hear it from
many places because everyone is selling food and supplements.
Every "diet" source has a supplement line or is receiving funding from
someone who does. The truth is you don't need any of it. The truth is
that you can make your own decisions about when you eat and what to eat
and yuo don't need experts.
Give it a shot and see what happens.
--- In fast5@yahoogroups.
>
> I have never done this before, so i am alittle skeptical. i was just
> thinking, wouldn't this slow down your metabolism and make it harder
to
> lose weight? I want to try it and i hope it gets results. thanks.
>
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
No comments:
Post a Comment